NFLW vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. NFLW is actively managed, while CRAK is passively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -50.09% vs 42.08% for CRAK. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

NFLW vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 20.86% return.

NFLW

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -21.07%
• YTD: -27.54%
• 6M: -27.44%
• 1Y: -50.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRAK

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 20.86%
• 6M: 20.73%
• 1Y: 42.08%
• 3Y*: 19.31%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-27.54%	-29.54%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	20.86%	17.63%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and CRAK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.13

NFLW vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFLW	CRAK
Communication Services	28.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	98.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 69
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLW	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	2.21	-3.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.99	2.98	-4.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.37	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	3.29	-4.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	11.53	-13.11

NFLW vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.89%	-58.80%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.89%	-12.84%	-41.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.85%	-12.74%	-41.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-12.47%	-15.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.61%	3.66%	+27.95%

Volatility

NFLW vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.42%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	6.42%	+3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.49%	15.00%	+15.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.43%	19.11%	+21.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.29%	20.67%	+19.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.29%	22.17%	+18.12%

NFLW vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLW vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, more than CRAK's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.67%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	87.68%	38.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and CRAK in my portfolio?

NFLW and CRAK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLW or CRAK?

NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to CRAK (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or CRAK?

On 1-year performance, CRAK leads with 42.08% vs -50.09% for NFLW. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLW or CRAK?

Over the 1-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 42.08% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or CRAK?

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or CRAK?

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 87.68%, compared with 1.67% for CRAK.

What is the main difference between NFLW and CRAK?

NFLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CRAK is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.