NFLW vs. CHPY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -52.02% vs 127.37% for CHPY. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

NFLW vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -28.72% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 80.95% return.

NFLW

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -22.35%
• YTD: -28.72%
• 6M: -28.62%
• 1Y: -52.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPY

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 9.84%
• YTD: 80.95%
• 6M: 79.34%
• 1Y: 127.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-28.72%	-29.54%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	80.95%	29.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and CHPY is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 0
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLW	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.29	3.94	-5.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.11	4.14	-6.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.61	-0.87
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	10.53	-11.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.64	36.72	-38.35

NFLW vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -54.60%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.60%	-12.19%	-42.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.60%	-12.17%	-42.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.60%	-7.85%	-46.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.97%	-2.15%	-25.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.79%	3.48%	+28.31%

Volatility

NFLW vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) is 9.81%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 19.71%. This indicates that NFLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	19.71%	-9.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.51%	27.92%	+2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.39%	32.59%	+7.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.24%	36.33%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.24%	36.33%	+3.91%

NFLW vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFLW and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

NFLW vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.13%, more than CHPY's 29.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	29.92%	28.19%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	89.13%	38.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and CHPY in my portfolio?

NFLW and CHPY have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLW or CHPY?

CHPY has higher volatility (19.71%) compared to NFLW (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -54.60% vs CHPY's -12.19%.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or CHPY?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 127.37% vs -52.02% for NFLW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NFLW has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLW or CHPY?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 127.37% return vs -52.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or CHPY?

NFLW and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or CHPY?

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 89.13%, compared with 29.92% for CHPY.

What is the main difference between NFLW and CHPY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.