PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLU vs. GGLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLU vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -46.72% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 11.40% return.


NFLU

1D
-0.32%
1M
-33.62%
YTD
-46.72%
6M
-46.68%
1Y
-73.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GGLL

1D
-2.70%
1M
-20.13%
YTD
11.40%
6M
10.14%
1Y
265.53%
3Y*
62.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
-46.72%-12.47%50.22%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
11.40%123.07%29.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and GGLL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.19

The correlation between NFLU and GGLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLU vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLUGGLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.55

-0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

6.97

-7.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

22.42

-23.92

NFLU vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLU Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLU and GGLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and GGLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLUGGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-52.81%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.74%

-38.39%

-38.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.74%

-28.02%

-48.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.18%

-15.22%

-13.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.08%

11.91%

+37.17%

Volatility

NFLU vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) is 16.02%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 19.04%. This indicates that NFLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLUGGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.02%

19.04%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.90%

42.25%

+8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.87%

59.29%

+8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.06%

56.23%

+12.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.06%

56.23%

+12.83%

NFLU vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GGLL's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLU vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
4.10%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLU and GGLL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGLL has higher volatility (19.04%) compared to NFLU (16.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -76.74% vs GGLL's -52.81%.

On 1-year performance, GGLL leads with 265.53% vs -73.54% for NFLU. On fees, GGLL is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 16.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 265.53% return vs -73.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GGLL is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.96% for GGLL.

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLU and GGLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer