PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLU vs. ETU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLU vs. ETU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -45.99% return, which is significantly higher than ETU's -73.80% return.


NFLU

1D
1.39%
1M
-17.32%
6M
-40.55%
YTD
-45.99%
1Y
-72.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETU

1D
-1.95%
1M
9.57%
6M
-75.88%
YTD
-73.80%
1Y
-81.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. ETU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
-45.99%-12.47%36.87%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
-73.80%-62.44%53.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and ETU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLU vs. ETU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ETU
ETU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETU Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. ETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLUETUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.91

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.87

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

-1.19

-0.33

NFLU vs. ETU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLU Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the ETU Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLU and ETU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. ETU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, smaller than the maximum ETU drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and ETU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLUETUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.98%

-95.01%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.70%

-93.91%

+18.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.42%

-93.62%

+17.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-64.18%

+33.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.98%

68.58%

-20.60%

Volatility

NFLU vs. ETU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) is 23.42%, while T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a volatility of 31.67%. This indicates that NFLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLUETUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.42%

31.67%

-8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.45%

95.15%

-41.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.15%

136.22%

-67.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.34%

145.00%

-75.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.34%

145.00%

-75.66%

NFLU vs. ETU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ETU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLU vs. ETU - Dividend Comparison

NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.00%0.05%
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLU and ETU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETU has higher volatility (31.67%) compared to NFLU (23.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -77.98% vs ETU's -95.01%.

On 1-year performance, NFLU leads with -72.67% vs -81.48% for ETU. On fees, ETU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 23.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NFLU has performed better with a -72.67% return vs -81.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

ETU has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

NFLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ETU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.95% for ETU.

ETU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLU and ETU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer