PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLU vs. ETU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLU vs. ETU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -32.09% return, which is significantly higher than ETU's -71.31% return.


NFLU

1D
0.36%
1M
-15.11%
YTD
-32.09%
6M
-44.93%
1Y
-65.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETU

1D
-11.73%
1M
-43.21%
YTD
-71.31%
6M
-75.33%
1Y
-75.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. ETU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
-32.09%-12.47%34.91%
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
-71.31%-62.44%50.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and ETU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLU vs. ETU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETU
ETU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. ETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFLUETUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.95

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.82

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-1.21

-0.21

NFLU vs. ETU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLU Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the ETU Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLU and ETU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFLUETUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

-0.55

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

-0.47

+0.37

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. ETU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, smaller than the maximum ETU drawdown of -93.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and ETU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLUETUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.10%

-93.02%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.10%

-91.48%

+19.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.35%

-93.02%

+22.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.02%

-62.40%

+34.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.49%

62.07%

-15.58%

Volatility

NFLU vs. ETU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) is 13.19%, while T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a volatility of 20.58%. This indicates that NFLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLUETUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.19%

20.58%

-7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.31%

92.66%

-41.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.63%

136.54%

-69.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.10%

145.94%

-76.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.10%

145.94%

-76.84%

NFLU vs. ETU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ETU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLU vs. ETU - Dividend Comparison

NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.00%0.05%
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLU and ETU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETU has higher volatility (20.58%) compared to NFLU (13.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -72.10% vs ETU's -93.02%.

On 1-year performance, NFLU leads with -65.71% vs -75.01% for ETU. On fees, ETU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 13.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NFLU has performed better with a -65.71% return vs -75.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

ETU has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

NFLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ETU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.95% for ETU.

ETU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLU and ETU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer