NFLU vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX Shares, while CWII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

NFLU vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -46.72% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.

NFLU

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -33.62%
• YTD: -46.72%
• 6M: -46.68%
• 1Y: -73.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,273.16%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 6M: 11,946.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-46.72%	-30.16%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,199.78%	-45.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and CWII is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	-0.02

Return for Risk

NFLU vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CWII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLU	CWII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.50	—	—

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than CWII's maximum drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLU	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-51.04%	-25.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.74%	0.00%	-76.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.18%	-33.26%	+4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLU	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.87%	13,701.30%	-13,633.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.06%	13,701.30%	-13,632.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.06%	13,701.30%	-13,632.24%

NFLU vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLU vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 123.26%.

Position	TTM	2025
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLU and CWII in my portfolio?

NFLU and CWII have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLU or CWII?

On fees, CWII is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLU or CWII?

CWII is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLU or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

What is the main difference between NFLU and CWII?

NFLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CWII is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 1.03% for CWII.