NFLU vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX Shares, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. NFLU is actively managed, while CRAK is passively managed. Over the past year, NFLU returned -72.52% vs 42.87% for CRAK. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

NFLU vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -46.55% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 21.87% return.

NFLU

• 1D: -11.62%
• 1M: -33.41%
• YTD: -46.55%
• 6M: -46.22%
• 1Y: -72.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRAK

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: 21.87%
• 6M: 21.93%
• 1Y: 42.87%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: 12.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-46.55%	-12.47%	50.22%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	21.87%	39.11%	-15.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and CRAK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024	-0.02

Return for Risk

NFLU vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 69
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLU	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	2.26	-3.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	3.03	-5.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.38	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	3.36	-4.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	12.03	-13.51

NFLU vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLU Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLU and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLU	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.67%	-58.80%	-17.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.67%	-12.84%	-63.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.67%	-12.01%	-64.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.07%	-12.47%	-16.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.84%	3.58%	+45.26%

Volatility

NFLU vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) has a higher volatility of 16.58% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.78%. This indicates that NFLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLU	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.58%	6.78%	+9.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.91%	15.00%	+35.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.00%	19.12%	+48.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.14%	20.67%	+48.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.14%	22.19%	+46.95%

NFLU vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLU vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.65%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLU and CRAK in my portfolio?

NFLU and CRAK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLU or CRAK?

NFLU has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to CRAK (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -76.67% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, NFLU or CRAK?

On 1-year performance, CRAK leads with 42.87% vs -72.52% for NFLU. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLU or CRAK?

Over the 1-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 42.87% return vs -72.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLU or CRAK?

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLU or CRAK?

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

What is the main difference between NFLU and CRAK?

NFLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRAK is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.