PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLU vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLU vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -45.99% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


NFLU

1D
1.39%
1M
-17.32%
6M
-40.55%
YTD
-45.99%
1Y
-72.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLU vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
-45.99%-12.47%50.22%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
28.75%-1.76%-33.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLU and BITI is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLU vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLU vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLUBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.26

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

2.72

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

6.78

-8.29

NFLU vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLU Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLU and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLU vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLUBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.98%

-92.16%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.70%

-25.28%

-50.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.42%

-85.94%

+9.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-68.34%

+37.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.98%

10.11%

+37.87%

Volatility

NFLU vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) has a higher volatility of 23.42% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 11.38%. This indicates that NFLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLUBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.42%

11.38%

+12.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.45%

34.25%

+19.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.15%

44.14%

+25.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.34%

52.28%

+17.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.34%

52.28%

+17.06%

NFLU vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLU vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.10%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
NFLU
T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLU and BITI have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLU has higher volatility (23.42%) compared to BITI (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLU dropped -77.98% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs -72.67% for NFLU. On fees, BITI is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs -72.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITI is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

NFLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLU and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer