NFLU vs. BEG
NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
NFLU vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -46.72% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 658.88% return.
NFLU
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -33.62%
- YTD
- -46.72%
- 6M
- -46.68%
- 1Y
- -73.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG
- 1D
- -13.66%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 658.88%
- 6M
- 577.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -46.72% | -1.13% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 658.88% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLU and BEG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLU vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank
NFLU
BEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFLU vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLU vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -59.85% | -16.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.74% | -13.66% | -63.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.18% | -16.74% | -12.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.08% | — | — |
Volatility
NFLU vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.87% | 212.91% | -145.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.06% | 212.91% | -143.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.06% | 212.91% | -143.85% |
NFLU vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLU vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NFLU nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLU and BEG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
NFLU and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for NFLU and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer