NFLU vs. ABNG
NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) and ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ABNG.
Performance
NFLU vs. ABNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLU achieves a -32.34% return, which is significantly lower than ABNG's -12.31% return.
NFLU
- 1D
- -4.65%
- 1M
- -21.10%
- YTD
- -32.34%
- 6M
- -45.65%
- 1Y
- -64.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNG
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- -12.31%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU vs. ABNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -32.34% | -29.65% |
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | -12.31% | 30.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLU and ABNG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLU vs. ABNG — Risk / Return Rank
NFLU
ABNG
NFLU vs. ABNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLU | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLU | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.46 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
NFLU vs. ABNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLU drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, which is greater than ABNG's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLU and ABNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLU | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.10% | -33.03% | -39.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.46% | -17.35% | -53.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.92% | -11.73% | -16.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.27% | — | — |
Volatility
NFLU vs. ABNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLU | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.63% | 63.13% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.18% | 63.13% | +6.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.18% | 63.13% | +6.05% |
NFLU vs. ABNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLU vs. ABNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NFLU nor ABNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLU and ABNG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
NFLU and ABNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NFLU and 0.75% for ABNG.
Find the right allocation for NFLU and ABNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer