NFLT vs. XAGG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

NFLT vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLT achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG's 1.93% return.

NFLT

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: 7.38%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: 4.13%

XAGG

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLT vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF	1.50%	0.47%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	1.93%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLT and XAGG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

NFLT vs. XAGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLT

NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 57
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLT vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFLT	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLT	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.88	-1.04

Drawdowns

NFLT vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLT drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, which is greater than XAGG's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLT and XAGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLT	XAGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-2.88%	-12.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.49%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-0.57%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLT	XAGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.01%	3.48%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.43%	3.48%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.93%	3.48%	+1.45%

NFLT vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NFLT and XAGG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

NFLT vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison

NFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than XAGG's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF	5.50%	5.74%	5.76%	6.02%	4.16%	3.41%	3.63%	4.33%	4.81%	6.23%	5.30%	0.67%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	3.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLT and XAGG in my portfolio?

NFLT and XAGG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLT or XAGG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLT or XAGG?

NFLT and XAGG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLT or XAGG?

NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.

What is the main difference between NFLT and XAGG?

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Eaton Vance.