NFLT vs. PCLO
NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus, while PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLT returned 7.11% vs 5.30% for PCLO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NFLT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PCLO.
Performance
NFLT vs. PCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLT achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than PCLO's 1.97% return.
NFLT
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
PCLO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLT vs. PCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.50% | 8.77% | -0.80% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 1.97% | 5.39% | 0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLT and PCLO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLT vs. PCLO — Risk / Return Rank
NFLT
PCLO
NFLT vs. PCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLT | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 2.76 | -1.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 20.27 | -17.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 123.68 | -110.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLT | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 5.94 | -4.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 4.62 | -3.78 |
Drawdowns
NFLT vs. PCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLT drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, which is greater than PCLO's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLT and PCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLT | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -0.76% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.42% | -0.26% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -0.03% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.04% | +0.51% |
Volatility
NFLT vs. PCLO - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) at 0.25%. This indicates that NFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLT | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 0.25% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 0.70% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01% | 0.90% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 1.15% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 1.15% | +3.78% |
NFLT vs. PCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLT vs. PCLO - Dividend Comparison
NFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than PCLO's 5.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 5.50% | 5.74% | 5.76% | 6.02% | 4.16% | 3.41% | 3.63% | 4.33% | 4.81% | 6.23% | 5.30% | 0.67% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 5.27% | 5.53% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLT and PCLO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLT has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to PCLO (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLT dropped -15.17% vs PCLO's -0.76%.
On 1-year performance, NFLT leads with 7.11% vs 5.30% for PCLO. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NFLT has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NFLT.
NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 5.27% for PCLO.
NFLT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while PCLO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NFLT and 0.29% for PCLO.
PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLT and PCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer