PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFIAX vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFIAX vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFIAX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NFIAX has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 4.58%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


NFIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.81%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
4.58%

VBR

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.54%
YTD
13.29%
6M
11.72%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFIAX vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFIAX
Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund
1.26%5.83%8.89%10.92%-3.26%4.27%3.63%8.31%-1.13%3.19%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
13.29%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NFIAX and VBR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2009

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFIAX vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFIAX
NFIAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NFIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NFIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFIAX vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFIAXVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.30

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.86

2.97

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.49

10.49

+6.00

NFIAX vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFIAX and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFIAX vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFIAX drawdown since its inception was -22.18%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFIAX and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFIAXVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.18%

-61.98%

+39.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-8.85%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.19%

-24.19%

+22.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.84%

-24.19%

+17.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.18%

-45.28%

+23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.14%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-8.25%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

2.50%

-2.19%

Volatility

NFIAX vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) is 0.57%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that NFIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFIAXVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

3.98%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

10.66%

-9.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19%

15.30%

-13.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.69%

19.73%

-17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

21.71%

-17.69%

NFIAX vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFIAX vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

NFIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than VBR's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFIAX
Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund
6.60%6.84%8.05%6.89%3.97%3.36%3.68%4.71%4.32%3.44%3.46%4.05%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFIAX and VBR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to NFIAX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFIAX dropped -22.18% vs VBR's -61.98%.

NFIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFIAX and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer