PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFIAX vs. DFRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) and DWS Floating Rate Fund (DFRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NFIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.81%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
4.51%

DFRTX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFIAX
Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund
1.37%5.83%8.89%10.92%-3.26%4.27%3.63%8.31%-1.13%3.19%
DFRTX
DWS Floating Rate Fund
0.51%3.50%7.82%11.54%-1.54%3.85%1.12%8.66%-0.49%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NFIAX and DFRTX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between NFIAX and DFRTX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFIAX vs. DFRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFIAX
NFIAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NFIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NFIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DFRTX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) and DWS Floating Rate Fund (DFRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFIAXDFRTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFIAXDFRTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

Drawdowns

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFIAXDFRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

Volatility

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFIAXDFRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DFRTX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFIAX vs. DFRTX - Dividend Comparison

NFIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than DFRTX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFRTX
DWS Floating Rate Fund
4.84%6.04%8.77%8.33%4.36%3.41%3.84%4.90%4.30%4.49%4.86%4.73%
NFIAX
Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund
6.59%6.84%8.05%6.89%3.97%3.36%3.68%4.71%4.32%3.44%3.46%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFIAX and DFRTX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFIAX and DFRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer