PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWFX vs. WAEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWFX achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than WAEMX's 27.06% return. Over the past 10 years, NEWFX has outperformed WAEMX with an annualized return of 11.48%, while WAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.


NEWFX

1D
0.53%
1M
5.56%
YTD
18.61%
6M
18.69%
1Y
36.61%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
11.48%

WAEMX

1D
0.47%
1M
2.37%
YTD
27.06%
6M
27.06%
1Y
36.95%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEWFX
American Funds New World Fund
18.61%28.16%6.45%15.75%-22.08%4.69%24.79%27.51%-12.32%32.56%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
27.06%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%27.45%-18.97%38.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NEWFX and WAEMX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.78

The correlation between NEWFX and WAEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWFX vs. WAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWFX
NEWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NEWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEWFXWAEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

4.77

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

14.03

-2.59

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the WAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWFX and WAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, smaller than the maximum WAEMX drawdown of -66.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWFX and WAEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWFXWAEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.71%

-66.35%

+9.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-7.89%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-25.56%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-44.88%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.68%

-44.88%

+11.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.00%

+6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-16.78%

+5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.68%

+0.57%

Volatility

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) have volatilities of 7.60% and 7.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWFXWAEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

7.37%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

15.57%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

18.30%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

17.92%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

18.27%

-2.01%

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than WAEMX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEWFX vs. WAEMX - Dividend Comparison

NEWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than WAEMX's 55.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEWFX
American Funds New World Fund
4.81%5.71%3.66%2.46%0.89%6.89%0.10%3.65%2.26%1.90%0.92%0.60%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
55.40%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWFX and WAEMX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEWFX has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to WAEMX (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWFX dropped -56.71% vs WAEMX's -66.35%.

NEWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWFX and WAEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer