PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWFX vs. GMAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWFX achieves a 17.42% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 56.32% return.


NEWFX

1D
0.70%
1M
6.72%
YTD
17.42%
6M
19.12%
1Y
36.24%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
11.00%

GMAQX

1D
3.50%
1M
28.37%
YTD
56.32%
6M
62.83%
1Y
91.37%
3Y*
34.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NEWFX
American Funds New World Fund
17.42%28.16%6.45%15.75%-22.08%-1.98%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
56.32%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NEWFX and GMAQX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.82

The correlation between NEWFX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWFX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWFX
NEWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NEWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEWFXGMAQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

4.49

-2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

6.01

-2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.93

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

6.62

-3.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.50

25.51

-14.01

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is lower than the GMAQX Sharpe Ratio of 4.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWFX and GMAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEWFXGMAQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

4.49

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.79

-0.26

Drawdowns

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, which is greater than GMAQX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWFX and GMAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWFXGMAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.71%

-41.97%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-13.77%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-19.64%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-16.75%

+5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.57%

-0.40%

Volatility

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds New World Fund (NEWFX) is 5.50%, while GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that NEWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWFXGMAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

12.53%

-7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

18.52%

-6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

20.84%

-6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

17.22%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

17.22%

-1.08%

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEWFX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison

NEWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than GMAQX's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
6.03%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEWFX
American Funds New World Fund
4.86%5.71%3.66%2.46%0.89%6.89%0.10%3.65%2.26%1.90%0.92%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWFX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMAQX has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to NEWFX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWFX dropped -56.71% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.49 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWFX and GMAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer