NESP.L vs. QYLU.L
NESP.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and QYLU.L (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - NESP.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD while QYLU.L tracks the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite v2 UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NESP.L returned 23.28%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for QYLU.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NESP.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QYLU.L.
Performance
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NESP.L is traded in GBp, while QYLU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NESP.L achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than QYLU.L's 5.02% return.
NESP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- YTD
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- 23.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLU.L
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NESP.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 15.77% | 12.78% | 28.66% | 48.13% | -7.81% |
QYLU.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 5.02% | -1.93% | 25.08% | 16.46% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NESP.L and QYLU.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.63 |
The correlation between NESP.L and QYLU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L — Risk / Return Rank
NESP.L
QYLU.L
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NESP.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 3.36 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 9.90 | -3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NESP.L drawdown since its inception was -40.98%, which is greater than QYLU.L's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESP.L and QYLU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NESP.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.98% | -22.59% | -18.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -4.80% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -22.59% | -2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -4.80% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.64% | -4.77% | -10.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 1.63% | +2.76% |
Volatility
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L) at 5.47%. This indicates that NESP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NESP.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 5.47% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 10.10% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 14.10% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 16.17% | +7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 16.17% | +7.37% |
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NESP.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLU.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NESP.L vs. QYLU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NESP.L nor QYLU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NESP.L and QYLU.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NESP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NESP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QYLU.L.
NESP.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while QYLU.L tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite v2 UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NESP.L and 0.45% for QYLU.L.
Find the right allocation for NESP.L and QYLU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer