NESP.L vs. JEQP.L
NESP.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and JEQP.L (JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. NESP.L is passively managed, while JEQP.L is actively managed. Over the past year, NESP.L returned 44.13% vs 29.62% for JEQP.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NESP.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEQP.L.
Performance
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NESP.L achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than JEQP.L's 8.97% return.
NESP.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 20.57%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 44.13%
- 3Y*
- 25.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEQP.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NESP.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 20.57% | 12.78% | 5.50% |
JEQP.L JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP | 8.97% | 6.58% | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NESP.L and JEQP.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between NESP.L and JEQP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L — Risk / Return Rank
NESP.L
JEQP.L
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L) and JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NESP.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.50 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 5.23 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 19.59 | -9.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NESP.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 2.63 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.94 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NESP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than JEQP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESP.L and JEQP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NESP.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -22.00% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -5.64% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.35% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.26% | -4.92% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 1.51% | +2.73% |
Volatility
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) at 1.57%. This indicates that NESP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEQP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NESP.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 1.57% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 7.83% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 11.20% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 14.88% | +14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 14.88% | +14.53% |
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NESP.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JEQP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NESP.L vs. JEQP.L - Dividend Comparison
NESP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEQP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEQP.L JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP | 10.21% | 10.04% | 0.73% |
NESP.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NESP.L and JEQP.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NESP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NESP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEQP.L.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NESP.L and 0.35% for JEQP.L.
Find the right allocation for NESP.L and JEQP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer