NESP.L vs. ANXU.L
NESP.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NESP.L returned 25.65%/yr vs 25.22%/yr for ANXU.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NESP.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXU.L.
Performance
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NESP.L is traded in GBp, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NESP.L having a 20.57% return and ANXU.L slightly higher at 20.95%.
NESP.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 20.57%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 44.13%
- 3Y*
- 25.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANXU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 42.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 19.21%
- 10Y*
- 22.69%
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NESP.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 20.57% | 12.78% | 28.66% | 48.13% | -25.12% | 8.81% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 20.15% | 11.32% | 28.95% | 48.68% | -25.30% | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between NESP.L and ANXU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between NESP.L and ANXU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
NESP.L
ANXU.L
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NESP.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 3.83 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 10.84 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NESP.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 2.68 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.30 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NESP.L drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, roughly equal to the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESP.L and ANXU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NESP.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -27.52% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -11.12% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.10% | -24.28% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | 0.00% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.26% | -4.99% | -5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 3.94% | +0.30% |
Volatility
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESP.L) is 4.41%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that NESP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NESP.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 5.02% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 11.74% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 15.89% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 20.08% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 21.15% | +8.26% |
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NESP.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NESP.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NESP.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, NESP.L and ANXU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NESP.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NESP.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.
Find the right allocation for NESP.L and ANXU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer