PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NESIX vs. OBSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) and Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NESIX achieves a 56.00% return, which is significantly higher than OBSOX's 25.99% return.


NESIX

1D
1.73%
1M
-8.85%
6M
38.72%
YTD
56.00%
1Y
78.30%
3Y*
25.24%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.53%

OBSOX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-6.31%
6M
22.50%
YTD
25.99%
1Y
44.55%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
17.59%
ALL TIME*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
56.00%11.16%13.47%5.85%-29.71%11.36%73.06%55.28%-4.87%12.63%
OBSOX
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund
25.99%14.28%16.13%15.81%-11.17%43.39%32.52%25.06%-7.05%25.55%

Correlation

The correlation between NESIX and OBSOX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.83

The correlation between NESIX and OBSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NESIX vs. OBSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NESIX
NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

OBSOX
OBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
OBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) and Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NESIXOBSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.88

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

10.39

+2.57

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the OBSOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESIX and OBSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESIX drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, smaller than the maximum OBSOX drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESIX and OBSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NESIXOBSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.61%

-80.52%

+30.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-14.64%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-27.74%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

-28.65%

-20.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.63%

-11.50%

-5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-30.41%

+15.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

4.05%

+1.67%

Volatility

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) at 8.97%. This indicates that NESIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NESIXOBSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

8.97%

+4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.18%

23.60%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.35%

28.37%

+5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.17%

25.50%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.86%

25.00%

+1.86%

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OBSOX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NESIX vs. OBSOX - Dividend Comparison

Neither NESIX nor OBSOX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.93%23.92%13.26%8.25%21.96%8.89%0.00%0.00%
OBSOX
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.80%0.00%0.17%21.88%4.05%3.04%28.22%6.36%4.24%11.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NESIX and OBSOX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NESIX has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to OBSOX (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NESIX dropped -49.61% vs OBSOX's -80.52%.

NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NESIX and OBSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer