PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NESGX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NESGX

1D
1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
74.77%
6M
77.64%
1Y
122.24%
3Y*
31.38%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
19.69%

UMBHX

1D
-1.21%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NESGX and UMBHX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NESGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NESGX
NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NESGXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.90

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NESGXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-20.59

+21.19

Drawdowns

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESGX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESGX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NESGXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.29%

-1.86%

-48.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.86%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-1.26%

-10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

Volatility

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NESGXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.08%

6.22%

+23.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.22%

6.22%

+23.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.80%

6.22%

+19.58%

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

NESGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither NESGX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NESGX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.16%25.09%13.69%8.43%22.26%8.94%6.67%2.52%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NESGX and UMBHX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NESGX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer