PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NESGX vs. NEEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NESGX achieves a 74.77% return, which is significantly higher than NEEIX's 52.41% return.


NESGX

1D
1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
74.77%
6M
77.64%
1Y
122.24%
3Y*
31.38%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
19.69%

NEEIX

1D
0.43%
1M
11.39%
YTD
52.41%
6M
53.04%
1Y
93.97%
3Y*
28.88%
5Y*
15.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NESGX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund
74.77%10.50%12.76%5.68%-30.21%10.59%71.90%54.42%-5.43%12.03%
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
52.41%9.32%19.26%27.30%-33.26%28.13%42.39%43.15%-10.13%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NESGX and NEEIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.88

The correlation between NESGX and NEEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NESGX vs. NEEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NESGX
NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEIX
NEEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NEEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NESGXNEEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.11

3.54

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.49

4.08

+0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.53

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.96

6.92

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.90

23.60

+5.29

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESGX Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is comparable to the NEEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESGX and NEEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NESGXNEEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11

3.54

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.53

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.65

-0.05

Drawdowns

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESGX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, which is greater than NEEIX's maximum drawdown of -43.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESGX and NEEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NESGXNEEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.29%

-43.11%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.16%

-13.22%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.27%

-36.13%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.05%

-43.11%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-10.87%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.88%

+0.25%

Volatility

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) is 8.14%, while Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that NESGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NESGXNEEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

8.79%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

20.47%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.08%

26.79%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.22%

28.24%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.80%

25.75%

+0.05%

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NEEIX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

NESGX vs. NEEIX - Dividend Comparison

NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
4.70%7.16%7.48%0.00%1.72%6.70%5.58%11.09%17.58%9.64%0.00%0.00%
NESGX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.16%25.09%13.69%8.43%22.26%8.94%6.67%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NESGX and NEEIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NEEIX has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to NESGX (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NESGX dropped -50.29% vs NEEIX's -43.11%.

NESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 3.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NESGX and NEEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer