NESGX vs. LMOIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NESGX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund) and LMOIX (ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class IS) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NESGX returned 17.52%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for LMOIX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NESGX charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for LMOIX.

Performance

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class IS (LMOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NESGX achieves a 52.82% return, which is significantly higher than LMOIX's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, NESGX has outperformed LMOIX with an annualized return of 17.52%, while LMOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.59% annualized return.

NESGX

• 1D: 5.19%
• 1M: -10.43%
• 6M: 37.28%
• YTD: 52.82%
• 1Y: 74.25%
• 3Y*: 23.55%
• 5Y*: 5.21%
• 10Y*: 17.52%
• ALL TIME*: 12.75%

LMOIX

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -4.90%
• 6M: 5.78%
• YTD: 12.12%
• 1Y: 20.37%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: 1.63%
• 10Y*: 11.59%
• ALL TIME*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LMOIX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class IS	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	52.82%	10.50%	12.76%	5.68%	-30.21%	10.59%	71.90%	54.42%	-5.43%	11.96%
LMOIX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class IS	12.12%	9.91%	12.06%	9.12%	-28.55%	12.53%	44.09%	25.86%	4.22%	25.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NESGX and LMOIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008	0.84

The correlation between NESGX and LMOIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NESGX vs. LMOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NESGX

NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 80
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

LMOIX

LMOIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
LMOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
LMOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
LMOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
LMOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
LMOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class IS (LMOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NESGX	LMOIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	0.77	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.19	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.14	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.19	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.77	4.04	+7.74

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the LMOIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESGX and LMOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESGX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, roughly equal to the maximum LMOIX drawdown of -51.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESGX and LMOIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NESGX	LMOIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.29%	-51.02%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.14%	-13.78%	-8.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.27%	-26.22%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.05%	-41.74%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.29%	-41.74%	-8.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.09%	-6.76%	-11.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.64%	-12.29%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	4.07%	+1.60%

Volatility

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a higher volatility of 13.35% compared to ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class IS (LMOIX) at 5.38%. This indicates that NESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NESGX	LMOIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.35%	5.38%	+7.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.13%	16.90%	+9.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.31%	21.47%	+12.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.16%	24.70%	+5.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.40%	23.80%	+2.60%

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LMOIX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

NESGX vs. LMOIX - Dividend Comparison

NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMOIX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund Class IS	15.13%	16.96%	14.66%	0.38%	0.00%	10.44%	6.31%	6.91%	14.40%	3.30%	2.82%	1.18%
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.16%	25.09%	13.69%	8.43%	22.26%	8.94%	6.67%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NESGX and LMOIX in my portfolio?

NESGX and LMOIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NESGX or LMOIX?

NESGX has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to LMOIX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NESGX dropped -50.29% vs LMOIX's -51.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.