NEMD vs. FENY
NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. NEMD is actively managed, while FENY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FENY.
Performance
NEMD vs. FENY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 29.32% return.
NEMD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FENY
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 21.33%
- YTD
- 29.32%
- 1Y
- 36.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 22.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
NEMD vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 4.23% | 7.10% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 29.32% | 7.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMD and FENY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMD vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank
NEMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FENY
NEMD vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEMD | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEMD vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and FENY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMD | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -74.35% | +69.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -8.45% | +7.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -23.01% | +22.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility
NEMD vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMD | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.51% | 20.83% | -14.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 26.31% | -19.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 29.78% | -23.27% |
NEMD vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMD vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison
NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than FENY's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.46% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 5.23% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMD and FENY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.
NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 2.46% for FENY.
NEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while FENY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.08% for FENY.
Find the right allocation for NEMD and FENY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer