PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEIMX vs. OANMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEIMX achieves a 15.83% return, which is significantly higher than OANMX's -0.83% return.


NEIMX

1D
-0.40%
1M
3.16%
YTD
15.83%
6M
16.30%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
10.20%

OANMX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
2.21%
1Y
11.71%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
15.83%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%23.49%-9.76%18.62%
OANMX
Oakmark Fund Institutional Class
-0.83%14.38%16.28%31.21%-13.18%34.87%13.09%27.35%-12.62%15.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NEIMX and OANMX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between NEIMX and OANMX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEIMX vs. OANMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

OANMX
OANMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
OANMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OANMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OANMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OANMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OANMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEIMXOANMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.36

0.97

+2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.65

1.46

+3.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.18

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.91

1.81

+4.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.73

4.67

+20.06

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEIMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the OANMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEIMX and OANMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEIMXOANMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36

0.97

+2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.53

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.59

-0.56

Drawdowns

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEIMX drawdown since its inception was -92.94%, which is greater than OANMX's maximum drawdown of -40.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEIMX and OANMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEIMXOANMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.94%

-40.08%

-52.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-6.93%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.94%

-17.01%

-75.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.94%

-23.55%

-69.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.12%

-3.38%

-85.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-5.58%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

2.69%

-1.32%

Volatility

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) is 2.50%, while Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that NEIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OANMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEIMXOANMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.93%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

9.34%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

13.01%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

576.30%

18.29%

+558.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

407.70%

20.64%

+387.06%

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEIMX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than OANMX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEIMX vs. OANMX - Dividend Comparison

NEIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than OANMX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%
OANMX
Oakmark Fund Institutional Class
1.15%1.14%1.34%1.22%1.17%1.94%0.33%8.53%8.37%0.66%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEIMX and OANMX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OANMX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to NEIMX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEIMX dropped -92.94% vs OANMX's -40.08%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEIMX and OANMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer