NEIMX vs. FDGFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NEIMX (Neiman Large Cap Value Fund) and FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NEIMX returned 10.34%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for FDGFX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NEIMX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDGFX.

Performance

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NEIMX having a 17.29% return and FDGFX slightly higher at 17.51%. Over the past 10 years, NEIMX has underperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 10.34%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.

NEIMX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 17.29%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

FDGFX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 5.10%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 19.03%
• 1Y: 39.07%
• 3Y*: 27.43%
• 5Y*: 16.05%
• 10Y*: 14.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	17.29%	18.68%	13.50%	6.15%	-5.16%	23.85%	-5.97%	23.49%	-9.76%	19.00%
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	17.51%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	27.96%	2.20%	28.75%	-7.23%	18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NEIMX and FDGFX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2003	0.87

The correlation between NEIMX and FDGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NEIMX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEIMX

NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NEIMX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.45	2.98	+0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.78	3.97	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.53	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.10	3.96	+2.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.48	17.79	+7.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEIMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is comparable to the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEIMX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEIMX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45	2.98	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.97	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.74	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.53	-0.50

Drawdowns

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEIMX drawdown since its inception was -92.94%, which is greater than FDGFX's maximum drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEIMX and FDGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEIMX	FDGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.94%	-60.77%	-32.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-10.16%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.94%	-21.37%	-71.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.94%	-21.37%	-71.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.94%	-41.29%	-51.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.99%	-0.08%	-88.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.51%	-7.52%	-2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	2.26%	-0.89%

Volatility

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) is 2.72%, while Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that NEIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEIMX	FDGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	4.03%	-1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.81%	10.59%	-2.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.18%	13.48%	-3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	576.30%	16.59%	+559.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	407.70%	19.22%	+388.48%

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEIMX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEIMX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

NEIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than FDGFX's 8.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.12%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	0.65%	0.76%	1.10%	1.36%	3.60%	17.65%	1.20%	2.26%	1.20%	6.64%	10.20%	4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEIMX and FDGFX in my portfolio?

NEIMX and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NEIMX or FDGFX?

FDGFX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to NEIMX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEIMX dropped -92.94% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.