PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFLX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFLX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFLX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.37%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.87% annualized return.


NEFLX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.19%
6M
0.26%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
3.68%

FTHRX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.59%
6M
-0.34%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
1.87%
ALL TIME*
3.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFLX
Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund
0.36%5.01%3.14%4.19%-4.74%-1.25%3.19%3.14%1.14%0.84%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.23%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFLX and FTHRX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1988

0.81

The correlation between NEFLX and FTHRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFLX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEFLX
NEFLX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NEFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFLXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.35

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

3.34

+4.18

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFLX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFLX drawdown since its inception was -7.37%, smaller than the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFLX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFLXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-19.01%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-2.11%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.34%

-2.50%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.21%

-13.18%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.37%

-13.25%

+5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.46%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-3.06%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.85%

-0.47%

Volatility

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) is 0.46%, while Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) has a volatility of 0.73%. This indicates that NEFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFLXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.73%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

2.18%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

2.74%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.49%

4.04%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.99%

3.40%

-1.41%

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFLX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFLX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

NEFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FTHRX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.41%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%
NEFLX
Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund
3.20%3.21%3.18%2.96%1.26%0.59%1.12%2.02%1.92%1.73%1.50%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFLX and FTHRX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTHRX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to NEFLX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFLX dropped -7.37% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

NEFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFLX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer