PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEARX vs. MUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEARX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund (NEARX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEARX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NEARX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.01%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.78% annualized return.


NEARX

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.31%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.01%

MUC

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.96%
YTD
5.75%
6M
6.05%
1Y
12.06%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
-2.32%
10Y*
0.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEARX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEARX
U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund
0.56%3.47%2.19%3.04%-5.25%-0.46%2.94%2.40%1.58%1.48%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.75%5.96%0.76%7.86%-26.81%7.38%11.85%18.12%-9.00%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NEARX and MUC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 1998

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEARX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEARX
NEARX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEARX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund (NEARX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEARXMUCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.86

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

7.52

-3.03

NEARX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEARX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEARX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEARX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEARX drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than MUC's maximum drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEARX and MUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEARXMUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.12%

-48.97%

-31.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-6.53%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.45%

-14.51%

+13.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.91%

-38.29%

+31.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.91%

-38.29%

+31.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-15.15%

+14.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.80%

-9.91%

-10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.61%

-1.05%

Volatility

NEARX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund (NEARX) is 0.86%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that NEARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEARXMUCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

2.14%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

6.35%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

8.18%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.51%

11.51%

-9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.55%

11.89%

-9.34%

NEARX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEARX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEARX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

NEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than MUC's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.90%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%
NEARX
U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund
2.50%2.45%2.65%2.50%1.10%0.88%1.10%1.46%2.01%1.47%1.36%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEARX and MUC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUC has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to NEARX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEARX dropped -80.12% vs MUC's -48.97%.

MUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEARX and MUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer