PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEARX vs. LSMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund (NEARX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEARX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 2.18% return.


NEARX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.79%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.06%

LSMSX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.48%
1Y
8.53%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEARX
U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund
0.56%3.47%2.19%3.04%-5.25%-0.46%2.94%2.40%1.58%0.68%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
2.18%3.22%2.22%7.96%-10.03%4.11%4.48%8.16%0.46%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NEARX and LSMSX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEARX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEARX
NEARX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMSX
LSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund (NEARX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEARXLSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.72

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.99

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

10.07

-5.36

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the LSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEARX and LSMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEARXLSMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.95

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.27

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.63

-0.55

Drawdowns

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEARX drawdown since its inception was -80.12%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEARX and LSMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEARXLSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.12%

-15.00%

-65.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-2.82%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.45%

-7.49%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.91%

-15.00%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.23%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-2.85%

-17.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.84%

-0.30%

Volatility

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund (NEARX) is 0.72%, while Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that NEARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEARXLSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

1.22%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

2.07%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

2.88%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.50%

4.49%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.55%

4.51%

-1.96%

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEARX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEARX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison

NEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than LSMSX's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
3.86%3.83%4.30%3.37%2.38%2.73%2.33%2.55%2.34%0.90%0.00%0.00%
NEARX
U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund
2.50%2.45%2.65%2.50%1.10%0.88%1.10%1.46%2.01%1.47%1.36%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEARX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSMSX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to NEARX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEARX dropped -80.12% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.

LSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEARX and LSMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer