NEAIX vs. CTSIX
NEAIX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NEAIX returned 23.19%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for CTSIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NEAIX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CTSIX.
Performance
NEAIX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEAIX achieves a 54.77% return, which is significantly higher than CTSIX's 31.81% return.
NEAIX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 12.83%
- YTD
- 54.77%
- 6M
- 60.01%
- 1Y
- 94.71%
- 3Y*
- 37.81%
- 5Y*
- 23.19%
- 10Y*
- —
CTSIX
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 31.81%
- 6M
- 33.04%
- 1Y
- 64.80%
- 3Y*
- 33.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
NEAIX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 54.77% | 26.99% | 14.86% | 38.37% | -27.02% | 38.46% | 52.49% | 21.73% |
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 31.81% | 25.90% | 44.34% | 7.57% | -37.30% | 9.12% | 63.38% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEAIX and CTSIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between NEAIX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEAIX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank
NEAIX
CTSIX
NEAIX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEAIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.71 | 2.41 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.22 | 3.06 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.39 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.67 | 5.34 | +1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.99 | 22.01 | +4.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEAIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71 | 2.41 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.37 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.56 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
NEAIX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEAIX drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAIX and CTSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEAIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -50.83% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.98% | -12.38% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.21% | -28.40% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.93% | -50.60% | +14.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -2.18% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -20.65% | +12.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.00% | +0.46% |
Volatility
NEAIX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) at 9.08%. This indicates that NEAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEAIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.80% | 9.08% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.25% | 21.15% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.68% | 27.63% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 27.97% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 29.77% | -5.19% |
NEAIX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEAIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEAIX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison
NEAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.77% | 4.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 1.30% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.84% | 3.80% | 10.42% | 16.35% | 5.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEAIX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEAIX has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to CTSIX (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAIX dropped -35.93% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.
NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEAIX and CTSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer