PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDVIX vs. TASVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS New Discovery Value Fund (NDVIX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDVIX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than TASVX's 23.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NDVIX has underperformed TASVX with an annualized return of 10.18%, while TASVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.


NDVIX

1D
-3.34%
1M
-4.18%
6M
3.92%
YTD
10.35%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
10.18%
ALL TIME*
10.46%

TASVX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.69%
6M
14.64%
YTD
23.39%
1Y
46.47%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
11.26%
ALL TIME*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDVIX
MFS New Discovery Value Fund
10.35%2.38%9.34%11.20%-10.79%33.58%3.65%33.65%-11.13%14.54%
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
23.39%13.71%18.76%16.92%-11.44%41.68%-3.08%15.56%-19.00%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NDVIX and TASVX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011

0.96

The correlation between NDVIX and TASVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDVIX vs. TASVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NDVIX
NDVIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NDVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NDVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TASVX
TASVX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TASVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TASVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TASVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TASVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TASVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS New Discovery Value Fund (NDVIX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDVIXTASVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.45

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

4.97

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

17.56

-12.69

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDVIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the TASVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDVIX and TASVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDVIX drawdown since its inception was -44.03%, smaller than the maximum TASVX drawdown of -59.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDVIX and TASVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDVIXTASVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.03%

-59.79%

+15.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-8.75%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.59%

-23.91%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.59%

-24.62%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.03%

-59.79%

+15.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-0.97%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-8.46%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.48%

+0.86%

Volatility

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Volatility Comparison

MFS New Discovery Value Fund (NDVIX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) at 3.50%. This indicates that NDVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TASVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDVIXTASVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.50%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

11.47%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

16.79%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

22.37%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

26.35%

-4.56%

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDVIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than TASVX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDVIX vs. TASVX - Dividend Comparison

NDVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than TASVX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDVIX
MFS New Discovery Value Fund
6.54%10.76%6.57%6.24%8.27%9.36%1.93%4.80%8.09%5.14%4.40%2.70%
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
1.05%1.29%26.54%3.43%22.08%1.46%1.38%2.81%10.87%13.42%1.83%45.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NDVIX and TASVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDVIX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to TASVX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDVIX dropped -44.03% vs TASVX's -59.79%.

TASVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDVIX and TASVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer