PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NDUS.L is traded in EUR, while XLIS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLIS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDUS.L achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than XLIS.L's 13.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NDUS.L having a 12.53% annualized return and XLIS.L not far ahead at 13.03%.


NDUS.L

1D
0.22%
1M
0.29%
YTD
9.13%
6M
10.79%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
12.53%

XLIS.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.46%
YTD
13.83%
6M
14.03%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
13.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDUS.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF
9.13%24.43%14.77%26.46%-15.90%28.50%4.07%34.71%-13.22%15.86%
XLIS.L
Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
13.83%5.19%25.04%14.39%0.70%29.56%0.85%31.64%-10.21%5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NDUS.L and XLIS.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.67

The correlation between NDUS.L and XLIS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NDUS.L
XLIS.L

Industrials

98.6%
96.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%

-

Technology

0.3%
1.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
1.3%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

0.0%
1.1%

Industrials

NDUS.L
98.6%
XLIS.L
96.3%

Consumer Defensive

NDUS.L
0.4%
XLIS.L

-

Technology

NDUS.L
0.3%
XLIS.L
1.3%

Basic Materials

NDUS.L
0.3%
XLIS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

NDUS.L
0.3%
XLIS.L
1.3%

Financial Services

NDUS.L
0.0%
XLIS.L

-

Communication Services

NDUS.L
0.0%
XLIS.L

-

Energy

NDUS.L
0.0%
XLIS.L

-

Healthcare

NDUS.L
0.0%
XLIS.L

-

Utilities

NDUS.L
0.0%
XLIS.L

-

Real Estate

NDUS.L
0.0%
XLIS.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDUS.L
NDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XLIS.L
XLIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XLIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDUS.LXLIS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.32

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.07

7.56

-3.48

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the XLIS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDUS.L and XLIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDUS.LXLIS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

1.39

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.76

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.67

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.71

-0.11

Drawdowns

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -41.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XLIS.L drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDUS.L and XLIS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDUS.LXLIS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.15%

-41.52%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-9.06%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.31%

-22.54%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.10%

-22.54%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.15%

-41.52%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-0.29%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-4.91%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

2.78%

+0.87%

Volatility

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) at 4.68%. This indicates that NDUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDUS.LXLIS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

4.68%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

11.72%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

15.07%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

17.45%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

19.50%

+0.30%

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDUS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NDUS.L vs. XLIS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NDUS.L nor XLIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NDUS.L and XLIS.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLIS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLIS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for NDUS.L.

NDUS.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XLIS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for NDUS.L and 0.14% for XLIS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDUS.L and XLIS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer