NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L
NDUS.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF) and XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from State Street and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NDUS.L returned 12.53%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for XLIP.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NDUS.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLIP.L.
Performance
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NDUS.L is traded in EUR, while XLIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLIP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDUS.L achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than XLIP.L's 13.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NDUS.L having a 12.53% annualized return and XLIP.L not far ahead at 13.05%.
NDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 14.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 21.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDUS.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF | 9.13% | 24.43% | 14.77% | 26.46% | -15.90% | 28.50% | 4.07% | 34.71% | -13.22% | 15.86% |
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 13.74% | 5.32% | 25.03% | 13.92% | 0.65% | 30.02% | 0.40% | 32.76% | -10.52% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDUS.L and XLIP.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.65 |
The correlation between NDUS.L and XLIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Industrials
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
Consumer Defensive
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
-
Technology
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
Basic Materials
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
Financial Services
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
-
Communication Services
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
-
Energy
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
-
Healthcare
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
-
Utilities
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
-
Real Estate
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
NDUS.L
XLIP.L
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDUS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.31 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 7.50 | -3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDUS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.51 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.80 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.69 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -41.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XLIP.L drawdown of -41.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDUS.L and XLIP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDUS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.15% | -41.07% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -9.08% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.31% | -22.63% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.10% | -22.63% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.15% | -41.07% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -0.58% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -5.16% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 2.80% | +0.85% |
Volatility
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that NDUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDUS.L | XLIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 4.24% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 10.60% | +5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.20% | 13.93% | +5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 16.61% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 19.04% | +0.76% |
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDUS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NDUS.L vs. XLIP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NDUS.L nor XLIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NDUS.L and XLIP.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for NDUS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for NDUS.L and 0.14% for XLIP.L.
Find the right allocation for NDUS.L and XLIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer