PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NDUS.L is traded in EUR, while PAVE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAVE.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDUS.L achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE.L's 27.59% return.


NDUS.L

1D
0.82%
1M
1.58%
YTD
11.75%
6M
11.68%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
14.05%

PAVE.L

1D
1.44%
1M
9.44%
YTD
27.59%
6M
26.76%
1Y
44.49%
3Y*
24.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NDUS.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF
11.75%24.43%14.77%26.46%-15.90%4.07%
PAVE.L
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
27.59%5.59%25.75%27.61%-0.53%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NDUS.L and PAVE.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.68

The correlation between NDUS.L and PAVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NDUS.L
PAVE.L

Industrials

98.7%
75.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
0.3%

Technology

0.3%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%
20.1%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
0.3%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Industrials

NDUS.L
98.7%
PAVE.L
75.1%

Consumer Defensive

NDUS.L
0.4%
PAVE.L
0.3%

Technology

NDUS.L
0.3%
PAVE.L
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NDUS.L
0.3%
PAVE.L

-

Basic Materials

NDUS.L
0.3%
PAVE.L
20.1%

Financial Services

NDUS.L
0.0%
PAVE.L

-

Communication Services

NDUS.L
0.0%
PAVE.L

-

Energy

NDUS.L
0.0%
PAVE.L
0.3%

Healthcare

NDUS.L
0.0%
PAVE.L

-

Utilities

NDUS.L
0.0%
PAVE.L
3.2%

Real Estate

NDUS.L
0.0%
PAVE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDUS.L
NDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE.L
PAVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDUS.LPAVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

4.67

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

16.16

-10.55

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the PAVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDUS.L and PAVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -41.15%, which is greater than PAVE.L's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDUS.L and PAVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDUS.LPAVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.15%

-29.89%

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-9.47%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.31%

-29.89%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-6.01%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

2.75%

+0.94%

Volatility

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) is 4.51%, while Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (PAVE.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that NDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDUS.LPAVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

5.49%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

14.65%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

18.67%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

21.45%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

21.45%

-1.89%

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDUS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE.L's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDUS.L vs. PAVE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NDUS.L nor PAVE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NDUS.L and PAVE.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NDUS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.L.

NDUS.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while PAVE.L tracks Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for NDUS.L and 0.47% for PAVE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDUS.L and PAVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer