NDIV vs. RNWZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NDIV is passively managed, while RNWZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NDIV returned 18.96%/yr vs 12.63%/yr for RNWZ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDIV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNWZ.

Performance

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than RNWZ's 16.28% return.

NDIV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 32.65%
• 6M: 28.18%
• 1Y: 34.21%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RNWZ

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 16.28%
• 6M: 16.86%
• 1Y: 38.19%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	32.65%	2.85%	6.18%	15.52%	0.95%
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	16.28%	36.33%	-7.36%	-3.89%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and RNWZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022	0.36

The correlation between NDIV and RNWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NDIV	RNWZ
Energy	81.7%	3.8%
Basic Materials	18.2%	4.5%
Financial Services	0.1%	6.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	5.3%
Real Estate	-	3.2%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	41.0%

Return for Risk

NDIV vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIV

NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 50
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RNWZ

RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 80
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NDIV	RNWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.55	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	3.40	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.45	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	6.33	-3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.55	15.60	-8.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the RNWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIV and RNWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NDIV	RNWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.55	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.61	+0.12

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, smaller than the maximum RNWZ drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and RNWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIV	RNWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-24.90%	+5.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.73%	-6.06%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	-24.74%	+5.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-4.46%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-7.19%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	2.45%	+2.10%

Volatility

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) is 4.65%, while TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that NDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDIV	RNWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	5.06%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	11.86%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.04%	15.06%	+4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	16.99%	+3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.92%	16.99%	+3.93%

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than RNWZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDIV vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than RNWZ's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	6.53%	5.64%	5.88%	7.37%	1.69%
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	1.93%	2.12%	2.36%	3.87%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDIV and RNWZ in my portfolio?

NDIV and RNWZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDIV or RNWZ?

RNWZ has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to NDIV (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIV dropped -19.73% vs RNWZ's -24.90%.

Which ETF is better, NDIV or RNWZ?

On 3-year performance, NDIV leads with 18.96% vs 12.63% for RNWZ. On fees, NDIV is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, NDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDIV or RNWZ?

Over the 3-year period, NDIV has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDIV or RNWZ?

NDIV is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDIV or RNWZ?

NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 1.93% for RNWZ.

What is the main difference between NDIV and RNWZ?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for NDIV and 0.75% for RNWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.