NDIV vs. PBOG
NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDIV is a Energy Equities fund tracking the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index, while PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NDIV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
NDIV vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NDIV having a 32.65% return and PBOG slightly lower at 32.22%.
NDIV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NDIV vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 32.65% | 0.89% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDIV and PBOG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDIV vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
NDIV
PBOG
NDIV vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDIV | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDIV | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 3.31 | -2.58 |
Drawdowns
NDIV vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDIV | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -11.45% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -6.81% | +2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.10% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | — | — |
Volatility
NDIV vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDIV | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 23.67% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 23.67% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 23.67% | -2.75% |
NDIV vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDIV vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 6.53% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDIV and PBOG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for NDIV.
NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
NDIV is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. NDIV tracks EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for NDIV and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for NDIV and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer