PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDIV vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NDIV vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NDIV vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NDIV
Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF
32.07%2.85%6.18%15.52%1.82%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
7.86%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%-5.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 32.07% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 7.86% return.


NDIV

1D
-2.80%
1M
5.95%
YTD
32.07%
6M
25.89%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
10Y*

KMLM

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.72%
YTD
7.86%
6M
9.64%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
0.19%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NDIV vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NDIV vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIV
NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIV vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDIVKMLMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

0.84

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.22

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.16

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.86

3.43

+1.43

NDIV vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIV and KMLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDIVKMLMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.84

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.48

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and KMLM is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

NDIV vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than KMLM's 4.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
NDIV
Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF
5.23%5.64%5.88%7.37%1.69%0.00%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.66%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and KMLM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NDIVKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.73%

-27.47%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.75%

-6.73%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-15.90%

+11.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-12.73%

+8.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

2.27%

+3.50%

Volatility

NDIV vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.03%. This indicates that NDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NDIVKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.03%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

7.26%

+7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.59%

9.85%

+14.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

14.58%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

14.67%

+6.35%