NDIV vs. FTSD
NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDIV is a Energy Equities fund tracking the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index, while FTSD is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. NDIV is passively managed, while FTSD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NDIV returned 18.96%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for FTSD. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. NDIV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.
Performance
NDIV vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.80% return.
NDIV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
NDIV vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 32.65% | 2.85% | 6.18% | 15.52% | 1.82% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.80% | 5.66% | 5.20% | 4.84% | -0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDIV and FTSD is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | -0.04 |
The correlation between NDIV and FTSD shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDIV vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
NDIV
FTSD
NDIV vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDIV | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.69 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 9.59 | -6.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 38.36 | -30.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDIV | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 3.30 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.04 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
NDIV vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and FTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDIV | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -5.32% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -0.45% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -0.93% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -0.12% | -3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -0.60% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 0.11% | +4.44% |
Volatility
NDIV vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that NDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDIV | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 0.51% | +4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 1.03% | +12.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 1.31% | +18.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 1.85% | +19.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 1.79% | +19.13% |
NDIV vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDIV vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than FTSD's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.50% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 6.53% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDIV and FTSD have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDIV has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIV dropped -19.73% vs FTSD's -5.32%.
On 3-year performance, NDIV leads with 18.96% vs 4.98% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NDIV has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for NDIV.
NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 4.50% for FTSD.
NDIV is categorized as Energy Equities, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for NDIV and 0.25% for FTSD.
FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NDIV and FTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer