PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCTWX vs. RIPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas II Fund (NCTWX) and Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NCTWX

1D
1.42%
1M
4.79%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.51%
1Y
-0.43%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
9.28%

RIPIX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.55%
YTD
4.79%
6M
5.57%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
-3.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NCTWX
Nicholas II Fund
-0.00%-1.27%6.74%19.89%-18.03%21.58%15.73%34.90%-7.77%
RIPIX
Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class
4.79%9.89%-7.04%8.14%-26.99%6.22%16.11%34.69%-12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NCTWX and RIPIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018

0.64

The correlation between NCTWX and RIPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCTWX vs. RIPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCTWX
NCTWX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
NCTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
NCTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

RIPIX
RIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas II Fund (NCTWX) and Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCTWXRIPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

0.37

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

0.61

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.07

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

0.28

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.08

0.69

-0.76

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCTWX Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the RIPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCTWX and RIPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCTWXRIPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

0.37

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

-0.20

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.16

+0.42

Drawdowns

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCTWX drawdown since its inception was -46.46%, which is greater than RIPIX's maximum drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCTWX and RIPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCTWXRIPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.46%

-41.89%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-16.38%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-17.33%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.89%

-41.89%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.25%

-22.76%

+14.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-18.00%

+11.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

6.67%

-0.30%

Volatility

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas II Fund (NCTWX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) at 3.12%. This indicates that NCTWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCTWXRIPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

3.12%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

10.60%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

13.10%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.09%

15.40%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

16.15%

+2.14%

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCTWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than RIPIX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCTWX vs. RIPIX - Dividend Comparison

NCTWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.43%, more than RIPIX's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCTWX
Nicholas II Fund
12.43%12.43%5.21%0.72%3.92%9.86%3.79%11.36%12.57%11.02%5.11%6.40%
RIPIX
Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class
1.39%1.46%5.66%3.09%3.87%5.02%0.36%0.58%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCTWX and RIPIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCTWX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to RIPIX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCTWX dropped -46.46% vs RIPIX's -41.89%.

RIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCTWX and RIPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer