PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCLEX vs. NPSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCLEX achieves a -7.51% return, which is significantly lower than NPSGX's 32.55% return.


NCLEX

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.30%
YTD
-7.51%
6M
-9.33%
1Y
-12.00%
3Y*
0.15%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*
7.44%

NPSGX

1D
1.94%
1M
6.04%
YTD
32.55%
6M
29.44%
1Y
63.57%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NCLEX
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund
-7.51%-10.41%11.91%17.17%-23.71%19.07%22.67%19.72%
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
32.55%17.88%20.83%20.05%-31.62%10.52%69.72%22.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NCLEX and NPSGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between NCLEX and NPSGX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCLEX vs. NPSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCLEX
NCLEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NCLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NPSGX
NPSGX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NPSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NPSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCLEXNPSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.41

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

4.87

-5.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

17.74

-18.72

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCLEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the NPSGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCLEX and NPSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCLEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, roughly equal to the maximum NPSGX drawdown of -46.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLEX and NPSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCLEXNPSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.68%

-46.95%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.36%

-13.45%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.50%

-28.03%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.50%

-46.95%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.62%

0.00%

-22.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-17.79%

+9.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.72%

3.69%

+7.03%

Volatility

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) is 4.54%, while Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that NCLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCLEXNPSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

9.39%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

20.79%

-8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

25.57%

-8.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.55%

28.31%

-8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

28.72%

-9.49%

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCLEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NPSGX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCLEX vs. NPSGX - Dividend Comparison

NCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than NPSGX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCLEX
Nicholas Limited Edition Fund
8.15%7.53%2.51%2.43%6.22%16.44%5.10%5.66%10.72%7.97%10.68%8.05%
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
3.40%4.50%5.89%0.00%0.00%21.28%9.50%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCLEX and NPSGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPSGX has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to NCLEX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCLEX dropped -48.68% vs NPSGX's -46.95%.

NPSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCLEX and NPSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer