NCLEX vs. LADYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX).
NCLEX is managed by Nicholas. It was launched on May 18, 1987. LADYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Dec 30, 1997.
Performance
NCLEX vs. LADYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCLEX vs. LADYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | -13.00% | -10.41% | 11.91% | 17.17% | -23.71% | 19.07% | 22.67% | 27.36% | -0.94% | 19.93% |
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I | -0.44% | 14.64% | 22.21% | 8.74% | -35.92% | -2.50% | 72.82% | 31.89% | 4.89% | 30.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCLEX achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than LADYX's -0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, NCLEX has underperformed LADYX with an annualized return of 6.82%, while LADYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.
NCLEX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- -13.00%
- 6M
- -15.05%
- 1Y
- -16.29%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -2.35%
- 10Y*
- 6.82%
LADYX
- 1D
- 6.26%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 38.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCLEX vs. LADYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCLEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LADYX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NCLEX vs. LADYX — Risk / Return Rank
NCLEX
LADYX
NCLEX vs. LADYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCLEX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | 1.36 | -2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | 1.91 | -2.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.25 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.53 | -3.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.99 | 9.13 | -11.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCLEX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 1.36 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.07 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.46 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.35 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCLEX and LADYX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NCLEX vs. LADYX - Dividend Comparison
NCLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, while LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCLEX Nicholas Limited Edition Fund | 8.66% | 7.53% | 2.51% | 2.43% | 6.22% | 16.44% | 5.10% | 5.66% | 10.72% | 7.97% | 10.68% | 8.05% |
LADYX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.60% | 7.58% | 18.36% | 28.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.82% |
Drawdowns
NCLEX vs. LADYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCLEX drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum LADYX drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLEX and LADYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCLEX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -60.18% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -14.67% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.50% | -50.98% | +22.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.79% | -54.05% | +18.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.21% | -20.61% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -20.22% | +12.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 4.07% | +3.77% |
Volatility
NCLEX vs. LADYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nicholas Limited Edition Fund (NCLEX) is 5.11%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a volatility of 12.64%. This indicates that NCLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCLEX | LADYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 12.64% | -7.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 20.98% | -8.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 28.61% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 27.53% | -8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 27.00% | -7.84% |