NCICX vs. SWSBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NCICX (New Covenant Income Fund) and SWSBX (Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, NCICX returned 0.23%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for SWSBX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NCICX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SWSBX.

Performance

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Covenant Income Fund (NCICX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCICX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than SWSBX's 0.34% return.

NCICX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: 1.45%

SWSBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NCICX New Covenant Income Fund	0.18%	7.13%	2.13%	5.15%	-11.32%	-2.06%	5.93%	7.16%	-0.10%	1.95%
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund	0.34%	6.06%	3.42%	3.95%	-5.89%	-1.28%	4.47%	4.96%	1.34%	0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NCICX and SWSBX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017	0.87

The correlation between NCICX and SWSBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NCICX vs. SWSBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCICX

NCICX Risk / Return Rank: 25
NCICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NCICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NCICX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NCICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NCICX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

SWSBX

SWSBX Risk / Return Rank: 38
SWSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SWSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SWSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SWSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SWSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Covenant Income Fund (NCICX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCICX	SWSBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.64	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.77	-0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.37	-0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.83	7.75	-1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the SWSBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCICX and SWSBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCICX	SWSBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.64	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.44	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.77	0.00

Drawdowns

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCICX drawdown since its inception was -21.12%, which is greater than SWSBX's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCICX and SWSBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCICX	SWSBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.12%	-9.06%	-12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	-1.54%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.71%	-1.79%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.08%	-9.06%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-0.63%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-1.79%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.47%	+0.35%

Volatility

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Volatility Comparison

New Covenant Income Fund (NCICX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) at 0.70%. This indicates that NCICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCICX	SWSBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	0.70%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.37%	1.62%	+0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.31%	2.23%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.81%	2.99%	+1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.79%	2.47%	+1.32%

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCICX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSBX's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

NCICX vs. SWSBX - Dividend Comparison

NCICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than SWSBX's 4.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NCICX New Covenant Income Fund	3.27%	3.24%	3.17%	2.79%	1.51%	1.46%	3.17%	2.43%	2.26%	1.92%	1.72%	1.80%
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund	4.13%	4.09%	3.66%	2.36%	1.11%	0.97%	1.82%	2.41%	2.12%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NCICX and SWSBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, NCICX and SWSBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NCICX or SWSBX?

NCICX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to SWSBX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCICX dropped -21.12% vs SWSBX's -9.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWSBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.