PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCATX vs. NOBOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern California Tax Exempt Fund (NCATX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCATX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than NOBOX's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NCATX has outperformed NOBOX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while NOBOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.14% annualized return.


NCATX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.31%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.56%

NOBOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCATX
Northern California Tax Exempt Fund
1.10%3.65%1.89%5.74%-11.26%0.74%4.85%7.67%1.00%4.97%
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
0.04%6.14%0.82%4.86%-13.84%-2.10%7.20%8.73%-0.17%3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NCATX and NOBOX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.53

The correlation between NCATX and NOBOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCATX vs. NOBOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCATX
NCATX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NCATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCATX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NCATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCATX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBOX
NOBOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NOBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern California Tax Exempt Fund (NCATX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCATXNOBOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.23

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.56

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

4.71

+2.64

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCATX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the NOBOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCATX and NOBOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCATXNOBOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.24

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

-0.10

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.23

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.59

+0.46

Drawdowns

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCATX drawdown since its inception was -16.55%, smaller than the maximum NOBOX drawdown of -20.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCATX and NOBOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCATXNOBOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-20.03%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-3.28%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.80%

-6.27%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-19.15%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.55%

-20.03%

+3.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-5.92%

+4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-3.54%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.08%

-0.17%

Volatility

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern California Tax Exempt Fund (NCATX) is 1.04%, while Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that NCATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCATXNOBOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.49%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

3.05%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61%

4.13%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

6.09%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

5.03%

-0.77%

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCATX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBOX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCATX vs. NOBOX - Dividend Comparison

NCATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than NOBOX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCATX
Northern California Tax Exempt Fund
3.02%2.85%3.39%2.46%1.47%2.18%2.85%3.82%3.51%3.19%4.08%3.21%
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
3.74%2.88%3.46%2.63%1.53%2.10%3.12%3.18%2.80%2.77%2.45%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCATX and NOBOX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOBOX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to NCATX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCATX dropped -16.55% vs NOBOX's -20.03%.

NCATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCATX and NOBOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer