PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCA vs. NVHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCA vs. NVHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund (NCA) and Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCA achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than NVHIX's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NCA has underperformed NVHIX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while NVHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.


NCA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
4.88%
6M
6.05%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
2.07%

NVHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.81%
YTD
1.93%
6M
2.36%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCA vs. NVHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
4.88%10.27%-1.92%10.39%-13.57%-3.51%4.62%21.08%-7.38%2.94%
NVHIX
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
1.93%2.43%6.88%3.54%-6.73%8.44%-0.10%8.27%3.47%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NCA and NVHIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2013

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCA vs. NVHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCA
NCA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCA Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NVHIX
NVHIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NVHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NVHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCA vs. NVHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund (NCA) and Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCANVHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.65

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.75

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

6.95

-1.01

NCA vs. NVHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the NVHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCA and NVHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCANVHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.21

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.63

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.93

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.12

-0.87

Drawdowns

NCA vs. NVHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCA drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than NVHIX's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCA and NVHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCANVHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.14%

-13.54%

-23.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-1.80%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

-4.72%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-10.54%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.97%

-13.54%

-9.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

0.00%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-2.04%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

0.71%

+1.67%

Volatility

NCA vs. NVHIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund (NCA) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX) at 0.68%. This indicates that NCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCANVHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

0.68%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

1.50%

+9.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

2.24%

+10.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

3.33%

+8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

3.47%

+9.01%

NCA vs. NVHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NVHIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCA vs. NVHIX - Dividend Comparison

NCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than NVHIX's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
3.80%3.89%4.12%3.88%3.66%3.02%2.98%3.21%3.79%5.33%4.36%4.34%
NVHIX
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.55%5.15%4.36%4.41%3.84%3.43%3.90%4.03%3.90%3.78%3.62%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCA and NVHIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NCA has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to NVHIX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCA dropped -37.14% vs NVHIX's -13.54%.

NVHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCA and NVHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer