PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSM vs. TEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSM vs. TEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSM achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than TEKX's 80.10% return.


NBSM

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.41%
YTD
5.59%
6M
3.81%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEKX

1D
-0.59%
1M
35.07%
YTD
80.10%
6M
66.58%
1Y
159.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSM vs. TEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBSM
Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF
5.59%-0.04%1.85%
TEKX
SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF
80.10%40.92%14.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSM and TEKX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.51

The correlation between NBSM and TEKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

NBSM vs. TEKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NBSM
TEKX

Industrials

32.3%
17.2%

Technology

17.8%
46.4%

Financial Services

16.4%
26.9%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Energy

7.2%
1.8%

Utilities

6.1%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
1.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.3%

Industrials

NBSM
32.3%
TEKX
17.2%

Technology

NBSM
17.8%
TEKX
46.4%

Financial Services

NBSM
16.4%
TEKX
26.9%

Healthcare

NBSM
8.4%
TEKX

-

Energy

NBSM
7.2%
TEKX
1.8%

Utilities

NBSM
6.1%
TEKX
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NBSM
5.0%
TEKX
1.5%

Communication Services

NBSM
2.7%
TEKX
1.7%

Real Estate

NBSM
2.7%
TEKX

-

Basic Materials

NBSM
1.5%
TEKX
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

NBSM

-

TEKX
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSM vs. TEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSM
NBSM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
NBSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TEKX
TEKX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSM vs. TEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBSMTEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.57

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

8.98

-8.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

29.66

-27.04

NBSM vs. TEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the TEKX Sharpe Ratio of 4.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSM and TEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBSMTEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

4.30

-3.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

1.94

-1.81

Drawdowns

NBSM vs. TEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSM drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, smaller than the maximum TEKX drawdown of -45.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSM and TEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSMTEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.16%

-45.57%

+20.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.12%

-17.92%

+7.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-0.59%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-10.30%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

5.42%

-2.05%

Volatility

NBSM vs. TEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) is 3.92%, while SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that NBSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSMTEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

10.60%

-6.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

29.62%

-19.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

37.51%

-22.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.09%

44.50%

-26.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

44.50%

-26.41%

NBSM vs. TEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NBSM and TEKX have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

NBSM vs. TEKX - Dividend Comparison

NBSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than TEKX's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NBSM
Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.38%0.40%0.23%
TEKX
SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF
0.20%0.36%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSM and TEKX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEKX has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to NBSM (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSM dropped -25.16% vs TEKX's -45.57%.

On 1-year performance, TEKX leads with 159.99% vs 8.81% for NBSM. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, NBSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEKX has performed better with a 159.99% return vs 8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NBSM and TEKX have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

NBSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.20% for TEKX.

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and State Street Global Advisors.

TEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSM and TEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer