NBSM vs. QMID

Last updated Jun 19, 2026

NBSM (Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF) and QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. NBSM is actively managed, while QMID is passively managed. Over the past year, NBSM returned 13.10% vs 10.56% for QMID. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBSM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for QMID.

Performance

NBSM vs. QMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSM achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than QMID's 2.20% return.

NBSM

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMID

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 2.20%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 10.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSM vs. QMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NBSM Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF	9.35%	-0.04%	0.03%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	2.20%	5.02%	-0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSM and QMID is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.91

The correlation between NBSM and QMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

NBSM vs. QMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NBSM	QMID
Industrials	30.0%	25.0%
Technology	18.1%	15.8%
Financial Services	16.9%	12.0%
Healthcare	11.3%	14.1%
Energy	6.2%	3.2%
Utilities	5.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	15.9%
Communication Services	2.5%	3.2%
Real Estate	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.5%

Return for Risk

NBSM vs. QMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSM

NBSM Risk / Return Rank: 26
NBSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
NBSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NBSM Omega Ratio Rank: 23
NBSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NBSM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 21
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSM vs. QMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBSM	QMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.70	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	1.11	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.12	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	0.99	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.89	3.36	+0.53

NBSM vs. QMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the QMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSM and QMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBSM vs. QMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSM drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QMID drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSM and QMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBSM	QMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.16%	-24.42%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.12%	-10.67%	+0.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	-2.02%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-5.42%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	3.15%	+0.23%

Volatility

NBSM vs. QMID - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) at 4.17%. This indicates that NBSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBSM	QMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	4.17%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	10.77%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	15.12%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	18.46%	-0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	18.46%	-0.38%

NBSM vs. QMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QMID's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBSM vs. QMID - Dividend Comparison

NBSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than QMID's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NBSM Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.37%	0.40%	0.23%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.50%	0.51%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBSM and QMID in my portfolio?

NBSM and QMID have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBSM or QMID?

NBSM has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to QMID (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSM dropped -25.16% vs QMID's -24.42%.

Which ETF is better, NBSM or QMID?

On 1-year performance, NBSM leads with 13.10% vs 10.56% for QMID. On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QMID has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBSM or QMID?

Over the 1-year period, NBSM has performed better with a 13.10% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBSM or QMID?

QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for NBSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBSM or QMID?

QMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.37% for NBSM.

What is the main difference between NBSM and QMID?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for NBSM and 0.38% for QMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.