PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSD vs. VSDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSD vs. VSDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSD achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than VSDB's 0.94% return.


NBSD

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.27%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VSDB

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.94%
6M
1.35%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSD vs. VSDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBSD and VSDB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.57

The correlation between NBSD and VSDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSD vs. VSDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSD
NBSD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NBSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VSDB
VSDB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VSDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSD vs. VSDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBSDVSDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.63

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.72

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.74

16.38

+4.36

NBSD vs. VSDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is comparable to the VSDB Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSD and VSDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBSDVSDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

3.04

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.05

2.65

-0.60

Drawdowns

NBSD vs. VSDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSD drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, which is greater than VSDB's maximum drawdown of -1.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSD and VSDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSDVSDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-1.42%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-1.42%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.16%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-0.19%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.32%

-0.09%

Volatility

NBSD vs. VSDB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) is 0.35%, while Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB) has a volatility of 0.55%. This indicates that NBSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSDVSDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

0.55%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

1.35%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47%

1.75%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.78%

1.90%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.78%

1.90%

+0.88%

NBSD vs. VSDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VSDB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBSD vs. VSDB - Dividend Comparison

NBSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than VSDB's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NBSD
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF
4.81%5.06%2.96%
VSDB
Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares
4.17%3.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSD and VSDB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSDB has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to NBSD (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSD dropped -2.63% vs VSDB's -1.42%.

On 1-year performance, VSDB leads with 5.27% vs 4.72% for NBSD. On fees, VSDB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NBSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VSDB has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSDB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NBSD.

NBSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.17% for VSDB.

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NBSD and 0.15% for VSDB.

NBSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSD and VSDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer