PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBRVX vs. ACLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRVX achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than ACLAX's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NBRVX has underperformed ACLAX with an annualized return of 8.04%, while ACLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


NBRVX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.88%
YTD
13.21%
6M
12.10%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
8.04%

ACLAX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.01%
YTD
8.80%
6M
8.14%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBRVX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund
13.21%11.01%9.11%11.05%-9.75%32.67%-4.29%17.22%-14.98%9.69%
ACLAX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class
8.80%8.52%8.18%5.93%-1.53%23.01%1.44%28.55%-12.93%11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRVX and ACLAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2005

0.90

The correlation between NBRVX and ACLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBRVX vs. ACLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRVX
NBRVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NBRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLAX
ACLAX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ACLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBRVXACLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

2.05

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.32

6.57

+5.75

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the ACLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRVX and ACLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRVX drawdown since its inception was -65.68%, which is greater than ACLAX's maximum drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRVX and ACLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBRVXACLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.68%

-51.37%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-8.50%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.62%

-14.67%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

-17.55%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

-39.24%

-13.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-1.61%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.80%

-6.25%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.65%

-0.04%

Volatility

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) at 3.16%. This indicates that NBRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBRVXACLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

3.16%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

8.61%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

12.00%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

14.63%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

17.49%

+4.02%

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRVX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Dividend Comparison

NBRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, less than ACLAX's 13.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACLAX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class
13.72%14.24%8.53%5.01%14.77%15.72%1.62%1.23%14.17%9.25%3.82%10.86%
NBRVX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund
9.92%11.23%6.19%1.94%0.90%0.54%0.04%1.10%9.15%0.49%0.52%12.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBRVX and ACLAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBRVX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to ACLAX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRVX dropped -65.68% vs ACLAX's -51.37%.

NBRVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBRVX and ACLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer