NBRVX vs. ACLAX
NBRVX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund) and ACLAX (American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NBRVX returned 8.04%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for ACLAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBRVX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for ACLAX.
Performance
NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBRVX achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than ACLAX's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NBRVX has underperformed ACLAX with an annualized return of 8.04%, while ACLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
NBRVX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
ACLAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBRVX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund | 13.21% | 11.01% | 9.11% | 11.05% | -9.75% | 32.67% | -4.29% | 17.22% | -14.98% | 9.69% |
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class | 8.80% | 8.52% | 8.18% | 5.93% | -1.53% | 23.01% | 1.44% | 28.55% | -12.93% | 11.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBRVX and ACLAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2005 | 0.90 |
The correlation between NBRVX and ACLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBRVX vs. ACLAX — Risk / Return Rank
NBRVX
ACLAX
NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBRVX | ACLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 2.05 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.32 | 6.57 | +5.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBRVX drawdown since its inception was -65.68%, which is greater than ACLAX's maximum drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRVX and ACLAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBRVX | ACLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.68% | -51.37% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.88% | -8.50% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.62% | -14.67% | -9.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.62% | -17.55% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -39.24% | -13.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -1.61% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.80% | -6.25% | -4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.65% | -0.04% |
Volatility
NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class (ACLAX) at 3.16%. This indicates that NBRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBRVX | ACLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 3.16% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 8.61% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 12.00% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 14.63% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 17.49% | +4.02% |
NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBRVX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBRVX vs. ACLAX - Dividend Comparison
NBRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, less than ACLAX's 13.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLAX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund A Class | 13.72% | 14.24% | 8.53% | 5.01% | 14.77% | 15.72% | 1.62% | 1.23% | 14.17% | 9.25% | 3.82% | 10.86% |
NBRVX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund | 9.92% | 11.23% | 6.19% | 1.94% | 0.90% | 0.54% | 0.04% | 1.10% | 9.15% | 0.49% | 0.52% | 12.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBRVX and ACLAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBRVX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to ACLAX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRVX dropped -65.68% vs ACLAX's -51.37%.
NBRVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBRVX and ACLAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer