PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBMAX vs. NPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBMAX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (NBMAX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBMAX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 1.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NBMAX having a 1.51% annualized return and NPV not far behind at 1.50%.


NBMAX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.73%
6M
0.32%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
1.51%
ALL TIME*
4.02%

NPV

1D
-0.55%
1M
-5.83%
6M
-1.18%
YTD
1.46%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
-3.35%
10Y*
1.50%
ALL TIME*
4.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$741.86K$696.68K$526.14K

NBMAX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBMAX
Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund
0.73%2.55%1.95%5.62%-11.47%2.18%4.95%7.88%0.06%5.51%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
1.46%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NBMAX and NPV is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.19

Over the past year, NBMAX and NPV have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBMAX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBMAX
NBMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NBMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NBMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBMAX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (NBMAX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBMAXNPVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.15

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

0.95

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

3.15

+6.53

NBMAX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBMAX and NPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBMAX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBMAX drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBMAX and NPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBMAXNPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-44.25%

+22.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.16%

-6.15%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.71%

-18.29%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

-44.25%

+28.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.62%

-44.25%

+28.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-19.99%

+18.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-10.21%

+7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

1.85%

-1.20%

Volatility

NBMAX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (NBMAX) is 0.79%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that NBMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBMAXNPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

2.19%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

5.24%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56%

7.19%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.95%

13.46%

-9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

13.15%

-8.95%

NBMAX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBMAX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBMAX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

NBMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than NPV's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBMAX
Nuveen Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund
3.03%3.56%3.34%2.92%2.39%1.96%2.49%3.09%3.15%3.04%3.37%3.64%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.22%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBMAX and NPV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to NBMAX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBMAX dropped -21.96% vs NPV's -44.25%.

NBMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBMAX and NPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer