NBFC vs. TMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBFC (Flexible Credit Income ETF) and TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBFC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMB.

Performance

NBFC vs. TMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flexible Credit Income ETF (NBFC) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NBFC

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 8.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMB

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBFC vs. TMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NBFC Flexible Credit Income ETF	0.01%
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NBFC and TMB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

NBFC vs. TMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBFC

NBFC Risk / Return Rank: 75
NBFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
NBFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
NBFC Omega Ratio Rank: 85
NBFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NBFC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBFC vs. TMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexible Credit Income ETF (NBFC) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBFC	TMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBFC	TMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	3.18	-0.95

Drawdowns

NBFC vs. TMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBFC drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, which is greater than TMB's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBFC and TMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBFC	TMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-0.24%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.24%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-0.06%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBFC	TMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21%	2.52%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	2.52%	+1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	2.52%	+1.11%

NBFC vs. TMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBFC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TMB's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBFC vs. TMB - Dividend Comparison

NBFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than TMB's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NBFC Flexible Credit Income ETF	7.33%	7.71%	3.95%
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBFC and TMB in my portfolio?

NBFC and TMB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBFC or TMB?

On fees, NBFC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBFC or TMB?

NBFC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBFC or TMB?

NBFC has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.

What is the main difference between NBFC and TMB?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and Thornburg. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NBFC and 0.55% for TMB.