PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBCM vs. NBET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBCM vs. NBET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBCM vs. NBET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NBCM
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF
23.23%17.45%6.55%-6.41%5.23%
NBET
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF
26.41%5.87%30.30%7.48%9.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBCM achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly lower than NBET's 26.41% return.


NBCM

1D
-0.53%
1M
7.56%
YTD
23.23%
6M
28.36%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
10Y*

NBET

1D
-0.98%
1M
3.75%
YTD
26.41%
6M
25.98%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBCM vs. NBET - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBCM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than NBET's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NBCM vs. NBET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBCM
NBCM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NBCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NBCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBCM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NBET
NBET Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBCM vs. NBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBCMNBETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.29

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

1.63

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

1.59

+1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.17

5.54

+4.64

NBCM vs. NBET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBCM Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the NBET Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBCM and NBET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBCMNBETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.29

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.78

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between NBCM and NBET is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NBCM vs. NBET - Dividend Comparison

NBCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than NBET's 2.30% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
NBCM
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF
6.86%8.46%5.22%4.37%0.80%
NBET
Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF
2.30%2.70%2.43%1.22%0.87%

Drawdowns

NBCM vs. NBET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBCM drawdown since its inception was -12.84%, smaller than the maximum NBET drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBCM and NBET.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBCMNBETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

-18.72%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-16.67%

+5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.55%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-5.13%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

4.79%

-1.48%

Volatility

NBCM vs. NBET - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) at 3.74%. This indicates that NBCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBCMNBETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

3.74%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

10.12%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

20.28%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

19.61%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

19.61%

-4.71%